No. Derivatives under the framework, as with employment-based immigrant categories generally, are the applicant's spouse and unmarried children under twenty-one. A married adult daughter is outside the file, and her U.S. residence does not shorten her parents' process.
Derivatives are defined by age and marriage, not by proximity
The couple's aim is to live near their daughter, and it is natural to hope the family connection helps. Under the official framework as read on 2026-09-07, additional family members included in an application are an accompanying spouse and unmarried children under twenty-one, each carrying an additional processing fee and gift. A daughter who is married, over twenty-one and already resident in the United States as the spouse of a U.S. citizen does not fit that definition, and no additional payment brings her within it. Her own situation may matter in a different way: once she holds U.S. citizenship herself, if she chooses to naturalize, she could petition for her parents as immediate relatives under the family-based provisions of the statute, a route with its own timing and no gift. Which route is preferable depends on when she might naturalize and how soon the couple want to move. Both should be laid out side by side before either is chosen.
Hypothetical example: a retired agricultural-equipment retailer wants to include an adult married son who will remain in the United States with his own household. Before discussing any payment, list every proposed family member with relationship, age, marital status and intended residence. Passports, civil records and the official terms in force on the relevant date settle who can be included; a family wish cannot broaden the stated definition. The payment, if the framework proceeds, is made by the named applicant to the U.S. government and is not a conventional visa investment. A common error is budgeting an added family payment before confirming that the person qualifies as a derivative. Compare any separate family-based route on its own requirements and timing rather than suggesting the two processes merge.
The stated payment framework is never a conventional visa. Any outcome still depends on the applicable statutory category and the applicant's own admissibility.